Readers told me that Book of Mormon Central Censor (BOMCC) released a no-wise #489.
At first, I was inclined to ignore this no-wise. Readers of this blog surely recognize the logical and factual fallacies it contains because we've come to expect this from BOMCC.
However, I decided to comment on the no-wise because it is further evidence that M2C is the hand-in-the-glove that created the false historical narrative in the Saints book; i.e., the real-life people in Saints, according to the authors, never heard of the Hill Cumorah in New York.
Hand in the glove post:
https://saintsreview.blogspot.com/2018/10/m2c-and-saints-hand-in-glove.html
Historians admit creating a false historical narrative to convey a modern viewpoint among M2C intellectuals that we have no idea where Cumorah is, except that it couldn't possibly be in New York. I discussed that here:
https://saintsreview.blogspot.com/2018/10/the-historians-explain-censorship-in.html
This is the so-called "neutrality" position that I discussed here:
http://bookofmormonwars.blogspot.com/2018/11/non-neutral-neutrality-in-gospel-topics.html
No-wise #489 is an effort to bolster the phony historical narrative in Saints. It is a masterpiece of sophistry and misleading readers, all to promote M2C (the Mesoamerican/two-Cumorahs theory). I provided an analysis on my Book of Mormon Central America blog, here:
http://www.bookofmormoncentralamerica.com/2018/11/no-wise-489-where-is-hill-cumorah.html
_____
If I was a donor to BOMCC, I would be furious about this latest effort to justify the repudiation of the teachings of the prophets about Cumorah. But this is just the latest in a long history of the effort by the M2C intellectuals to persuade members of the Church that the prophets are wrong.
To be sure, all the M2C intellectuals are great people, faithful members of the Church, etc. I like every one of them personally. This is purely a discussion about ideas, about censorship, and about enabling members (and nonmembers) of the Church to make fully informed decisions.
I think the ongoing censorship, obfuscation, and sophistry should cease ASAP.
At first, I was inclined to ignore this no-wise. Readers of this blog surely recognize the logical and factual fallacies it contains because we've come to expect this from BOM
However, I decided to comment on the no-wise because it is further evidence that M2C is the hand-in-the-glove that created the false historical narrative in the Saints book; i.e., the real-life people in Saints, according to the authors, never heard of the Hill Cumorah in New York.
Hand in the glove post:https://saintsreview.blogspot.com/2018/10/m2c-and-saints-hand-in-glove.html
Historians admit creating a false historical narrative to convey a modern viewpoint among M2C intellectuals that we have no idea where Cumorah is, except that it couldn't possibly be in New York. I discussed that here:
https://saintsreview.blogspot.com/2018/10/the-historians-explain-censorship-in.html
This is the so-called "neutrality" position that I discussed here:
http://bookofmormonwars.blogspot.com/2018/11/non-neutral-neutrality-in-gospel-topics.html
No-wise #489 is an effort to bolster the phony historical narrative in Saints. It is a masterpiece of sophistry and misleading readers, all to promote M2C (the Mesoamerican/two-Cumorahs theory). I provided an analysis on my Book of Mormon Central America blog, here:
http://www.bookofmormoncentralamerica.com/2018/11/no-wise-489-where-is-hill-cumorah.html
_____
If I was a donor to BOM
To be sure, all the M2C intellectuals are great people, faithful members of the Church, etc. I like every one of them personally. This is purely a discussion about ideas, about censorship, and about enabling members (and nonmembers) of the Church to make fully informed decisions.
I think the ongoing censorship, obfuscation, and sophistry should cease ASAP.
No comments:
Post a Comment